[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Jun 18 09:29:46 UTC 2006

Le samedi 17 juin 2006 à 22:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
> On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 16:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> > Why and when would they supply a package, which is in Core or Extras
> > already, with an incompatible version than what either is in Core and
> > Extras or will be in Core or Extras later
> E.g. because 
> * legal restrictions prohibits Core or Extras to ship them
> * developers use repos to ship upstream snapshots for testing.

The snapshot you're not happy about was/is shipped in devel, during at
most one week, and is perfectly dogfoodable (not as good as the actual
release will be, but not eating babies or anything like it).
Please find another horse to beat.

> * local demands require packages neither FC nor FE ships.
> * packages are stuck in FE review.


Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060618/508714a1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list