[Fedora-packaging] Non standard locations for man pages

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 15:01 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> In an effort to package up multiple MPI libraries (LAM-MPI, Open-MPI, 
> and MPICH2), we're running into a number of issues with file conflicts. 
>   The current strategy is to move many things into /usr/share/%{name}. 
> However, man pages put in /usr/share/%{name}/man are not compressed.
> 
> Should I just file a bug against /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress (rpm-build) 
> to add that pattern?  Current list is:
> 
> for d in ./usr/man/man* ./usr/man/*/man* ./usr/info \
>          ./usr/share/man/man* ./usr/share/man/*/man* ./usr/share/info \
>          ./usr/kerberos/man ./usr/X11R6/man/man* ./usr/lib/perl5/man/man* \
>          ./usr/share/doc/*/man/man* ./usr/lib/*/man/man*
> 
> Or should the man pages go elsewhere?
> 
> Anything I should do in the meantime to compress the man pages manually 
> if this is the right location until rpm-build is fixed?

Well, keep in mind that man won't look in /usr/share/*/man as configured
in the fedora man package. (Look in /etc/man.config for confirmation of
this). This will need to be fixed at the same time
as /usr/lib/rpm/bmp-compress.

It also won't look in /usr/share/doc/*/man (but rpm is configured for
it). I don't care which one we use, but either one will require changes
to the man package configuration.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!