[Fedora-packaging] Re: Fedora Packaging Member forking Fedora/Causing problems with community and users

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Mon Nov 20 18:42:02 UTC 2006

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 09:59 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 11/20/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> >
> > spot's suggestion was to start a (constructive) dialog regarding this issue.
> > IMO, mass-filing formletter-type bugs is certainly no way to go about that,
> > and I'm not a bit surprised by Axel's (non)response.
> Using bugzilla for discussion is not the way to go?
> Wow.  This is mind boggling.  Just how do you expect me to start a
> discussion?  Is there a ATrpms mailing list or something?  Even if
> there was a mailing list, why would bugzilla be less appropriate?  I
> am totally dumbfounded...

Umm, how about filing a couple of bugs initially, instead of
carpet-bombing him?  It came off as very antagonist filing all those
bugs, especially given how you started this whole discussion.

Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061120/82012c61/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list