[Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Oct 12 19:57:19 UTC 2006
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I'm not arguing against the "no static lib" policy, and I'm not
> arguing against removing .la files. I'm only arguing against patching
> libtool in ways that have negative consequences for other OSes,
> because this would affect Fedora users that develop on Fedora and
> expect the libtool in it to deliver them portability to other OSes.
Ah, and you must've missed that I qualified the use of ignoring
dependancy_libs only on platforms that *can* (ie, linux) and not using
it in the case of static linking. (:
-- Rex
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list