[Fedora-packaging] Re: Refining today's "don't touch system fs" guideline

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Oct 13 13:58:09 UTC 2006


On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > doesn't make a real difference.
> > 
> > It does. ;)
> > 
> > The former installs into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT without doing "rm -rf
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" first. It would need to do this at the beginning of
> > %build (!).
> hastly off-head scribbled pseudo-code", you know?
> 
> The real world case in FE, I am facing this issue with, does have an
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %build ;)

And you consider that proper? This package should not be allowed to
pass the review!

*Shudder*
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061013/d825a345/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list