[Fedora-packaging] libtool(.la) archive policy proposal
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Oct 2 17:40:25 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 07:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> See
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives
> >> Comments?
> > It's a fault to remove *.la's.
> Thanks so much for the constructive input.
What do you expect as an answer to somebody who has been and is
spreading FUD on libtool for a very long time, has a web page called
"libtool sucks" and despite the fact he is agitating against libtool,
has NEVER EVER shown up on any libtool list, nor reported a bug?
If you have got something to say against libtool, report it upstream or
stop this foul propaganda.
More information about the Fedora-packaging