[Fedora-packaging] Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Oct 3 19:54:38 UTC 2006

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Explanation of patch:
> ...
>> acinclude.m4, ltdl.m4: Probably only ltdl.m4 needs to be changed here.
>> Basically I replaced the erroroneous detection with the simple check of
>> newer libtools.  This step is needed because arts includes its own,
>> somewhat dated, copy of libltdl.  Do we want to get rid of that anyway
>> (because we want to use system libraries whenever possible)?  Or does
>> arts need this specific version of libltdl for some reason?
> How's the best way to use a newer/different libltdl?  (Naively?) replace 
> arts' libltdl/ with that from /usr/share/libtool/libltdl?

Or just:
$ libtoolize --ltdl --force
? (:

-- Rex

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list