[Fedora-packaging] Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Oct 3 19:54:38 UTC 2006
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Explanation of patch:
>> acinclude.m4, ltdl.m4: Probably only ltdl.m4 needs to be changed here.
>> Basically I replaced the erroroneous detection with the simple check of
>> newer libtools. This step is needed because arts includes its own,
>> somewhat dated, copy of libltdl. Do we want to get rid of that anyway
>> (because we want to use system libraries whenever possible)? Or does
>> arts need this specific version of libltdl for some reason?
> How's the best way to use a newer/different libltdl? (Naively?) replace
> arts' libltdl/ with that from /usr/share/libtool/libltdl?
$ libtoolize --ltdl --force
More information about the Fedora-packaging