[Fedora-packaging] Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

[Enrico Scholz]

aoliva at redhat.com (Alexandre Oliva) writes:

>> no; 'libbar.la' might be used by a 'libbaz.la' loadable module which
>> is added to the repository a year later by a different maintainer.
>
> Not if libbar.la was not installed.

So you suggest to avoid packaging of .la files?



Enrico
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061013/491d75e6/attachment.sig>