[Fedora-packaging] Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Oct 14 12:09:57 UTC 2006

On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> then they must be in main packages, not in -devel. This thread shows
> why.

Makes one wonder how RHL/RHEL/FC worked w/o doing so. Or given
that they did work one wonders what makes you say that.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061014/3b8fbf6c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list