[Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 14:44 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 
> > Although it's perfectly reasonable for
> > Fedora to provide a default, it shouldn't/can't rely on me or you keeping
> > that default, because, as Axel points out, there's many perfectly good ways
> > for arranging this directory depending on system usage.
> 
> As long as Fedora can provide a default and rely on the sysadmin
> creating directories, updating conf files, selinux contexts, if he
> wishes another policy all is fine

How, if the distribution defaults are in the way?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061023/f58c4e4b/attachment.sig>