[Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Mon Oct 23 20:11:40 UTC 2006


Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 22:04 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 14:44 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > 
> > > Although it's perfectly reasonable for
> > > Fedora to provide a default, it shouldn't/can't rely on me or you keeping
> > > that default, because, as Axel points out, there's many perfectly good ways
> > > for arranging this directory depending on system usage.
> > 
> > As long as Fedora can provide a default and rely on the sysadmin
> > creating directories, updating conf files, selinux contexts, if he
> > wishes another policy all is fine
> 
> How, if the distribution defaults are in the way?

Just put distributions defaults under /srv/whatever if you're afraid of
collisions. With whatever being system if you're reasonable and
DoctObnik! or wi.drigco if you're not

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list