[Fedora-packaging] changelog entries: release with disttag?
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Tue Sep 19 15:36:39 UTC 2006
Hiyas,
what information about E-V-R should be in changelog entries?
In
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213
the first example is:
* Wed Jun 14 2003 Joe Packager <joe at gmail.com> - 0:1.0-0.fdr.2
This seems to contain %{?dist} (fdr) but the other examples do not. This is
irritating. And as far as I understand the NamingGuidelines 0.fdr.2 is not a
valid release tag nowadays.
In http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/sipsak.spec (sipsak has been submitted as
a review request (206872)) %{?dist} is used in a changelog entry, is this
allowed?
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060919/7e8e6242/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list