[Fedora-packaging] changelog entries: release with disttag?

[Rex Dieter]

Till Maas wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
>> NamingGuidelines (mostly) only pertain to *new* changelog entries.
>> Maintaining old ones as-is is important to see the history of the
>> package.  0.fdr.2 dates back to the fedora.us days.
> 
> The Packaging Guidelines describe how new changelog entries should the added 
> and this example is used to show how new changelog entries should be added. 
> Since it is not correct anymore it should be changed to a current, valid one.

No biggie, though that's not one including in the section labeled "You 
must use one of the following (changelog) formats"... (:

-- Rex