[Fedora-packaging] changelog entries: release with disttag?

[Rex Dieter]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
>> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> NamingGuidelines (mostly) only pertain to *new* changelog entries.
>>> Maintaining old ones as-is is important to see the history of the
>>> package.  0.fdr.2 dates back to the fedora.us days.
>>
>> The Packaging Guidelines describe how new changelog entries should the 
>> added and this example is used to show how new changelog entries 
>> should be added. Since it is not correct anymore it should be changed 
>> to a current, valid one.
> 
> No biggie, though that's not one including in the section labeled "You 
> must use one of the following (changelog) formats"... (:

OK, Guideline updated to remove reference to 0.fdr in changelog example.

-- Rex