[Fedora-packaging] Should packages really own their config files???

[Axel Thimm]

Of course they should (IMO), the subject is just for catching your
attention.

But prominent rpm persona think otherwise - Jeff Johnson considers rpm
owning its own /etc/rpm/config file wrong and even questions that
there exists a convention of packages owning their config files.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204606

Isn't this handled in some guidelines? If not shouldn't it?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060902/f2ebc563/attachment.sig>