[Fedora-packaging] Should packages really own their config files???

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Sep 2 16:05:51 UTC 2006

On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Isn't this handled in some guidelines? If not shouldn't it?

I thought we had a rule about creating files in %post or whatnot and not
owning them.  I could be wrong, but I check for that when I review
packages.  IMHO any file a package creates on the file system at install
time should be owned or ghosted by that package.

Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060902/12389f9b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list