[Fedora-packaging] Re: Should packages really own their config files???

Toshio Kuratomi toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Tue Sep 5 05:59:55 UTC 2006

On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:00 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:14:49PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > I argued for such a rule, but others pointed out examples where this is
> > not always/generally a good idea, so the proposal did not have the
> > support to pass.
> Were the examples for certificate/ssh keys only? I don't really meant
> these with "config files". Are there any arguments against owning
> config files but certifcates/ssh keys?

I don't recall anything except certificates.  The log of that meeting is

Relevant timeframe: (09:33:08) - (09:59:24)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060904/e8e57365/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list