[Fedora-packaging] Re: Including a static library

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Sep 25 11:59:26 UTC 2006

Matthias Saou wrote:

> Regarding this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/204568
> It does makes sense to ship the DirectFB static libraries for some
> users. So here are my questions :
> - Should they be put into the existing -devel sub-package?
> - Should they be put into a new separate sub-package? (-static)

As long as the static lib doesn't change the behavior of (most) typical
builds using 
BuildRequires: DirectFB-devel
I'd say a separate package is overkill.

-- Rex

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list