[Fedora-packaging] Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Sep 26 17:17:54 UTC 2006
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> You should probably also mention /etc/ld.so.conf.d.
Since that's (should be!) already referenced in /etc/ld.so.conf, I figured
it didn't need to be explictly mentioned. Maybe I was being too
> I hope it's not
> necessary to note specifically that a package can't have .la files in
> directories that it adds to the ld search path.
I hope that too. (:
More information about the Fedora-packaging