[Fedora-packaging] Re: Statistics on usage of disttags in Fedora Core and Extras

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Apr 6 18:22:40 UTC 2007

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 13:52:12 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I would recommend at least one rebuild of a package just before release
> > though for everything but pure data packages.  I've been surprised by
> > what has changed and caused failures.
> Continuous rebuilds are done, just not imported.  I think this is great, we 
> get the benefit without the churn.  Churning the entire package set without 
> reason is ridiculous and may do more harm than good.  See Matt D's 
> core/extras rebuild reports.

But nobody tests them. Only fatal build errors are probed that way.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070406/f2335702/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list