[Fedora-packaging] Statistics on usage of disttags in Fedora Core and Extras

Christopher Stone chris.stone at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 17:26:02 UTC 2007


On 4/9/07, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007 13:13:25 Christopher Stone wrote:
> > Checking to see if a package still builds correctly is more important
> > than a little extra processing time during upgrades. I'm pretty sure
> > people expect full upgrades to take a bit of time.
> >
> > Just my opinoin.
>
> What you fail to realize is that you can accomplish checking to see if things
> build correctly without making those builds go to everybody in the universe
> as an update.  These things are not tied together.
>
> I'm all for continuous rebuild testing, what I'm not for is continuous
> churning of packages needlessly that users have to consume.

I realize it, I just think you aren't sacrificing much to update dist
tags on a new release, so in my opinion you may as well do a rebuild
test on the branch itself as part of the release process.

The only semi-official way to upgrade is to download the dvd anyway.
And for the people who upgrade via yum, they will have to wait an
extra few minutes to download a couple megs of dist tag deltas and
headers.  Not a very big deal in my opinion.

Just an idea, nothing more.  Whether or not you choose to implement it
for F8 is ofcourse entirely up to the release team.




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list