[Fedora-packaging] Re: Using of date in snapshot versions

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Apr 14 11:13:20 UTC 2007

On Saturday 14 April 2007 05:24:24 Axel Thimm wrote:
> The convention is reversed, e.g. people say cvs20061005 and
> svn512. This doesn't change any ordering logig, is easier to read (the
> suffixing style merges the vcs id with the actual build ids, prefixing
> brings a eye-natural separator),

I wouldn't mind this method either, although I'm ignoring the flamebait in the 
rest of this mail.  The above was enough.

Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070414/98bd1aac/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list