[Fedora-packaging] Re: Statistics on usage of disttags in Fedora Core and Extras

Matthias Saou thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
Mon Apr 16 11:04:09 UTC 2007

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote :

> On 16.04.2007 11:54, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC this is not true : A rebuild is also considered "failed" if it
> > creates packages with different requires or provides than the ones from
> > the packages in the repository.
> > 
> That would be news to me. I'm not aware of any such checks in the Extras 
> buildsys, and none of my packages ever stumbled over such checks -- 
> which I'd say would be likely.

I'm not referring to the buildsys, but to Matt Domsch's automated
rebuilds and reports.


Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2943.fc6
Load : 1.20 1.25 0.94

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list