[Fedora-packaging] multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r

[Jarod Wilson]

Till Maas wrote:
> Aloas,
> 
> is it ok to use multiple changelog entries for one e-v-r?
> 
> E.g.:
> 
> %changelog
> * Thu Jun 15 2003 Joe Packager <joe at gmail.com> - 1.0-2
> - Added LICENSE file (#43).
> 
> * Wed Jun 14 2003 Joe Packager <joe at gmail.com> - 1.0-2
> - Added README file (#42).

I'd say no. Just put both changes under one entry w/the most recent
date. At least, that's what I do. I believe rpmlint may complain about
the above case, and if not, it probably should, since its bogus to have
two different builds w/the same evr.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070802/3034bb27/attachment.sig>