[Fedora-packaging] Licensing guidelines suggestions
paul at city-fan.org
Mon Aug 13 14:32:38 UTC 2007
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:30 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> I've been working my way through my packages, updating the license
>> fields as appropriate. I just came across perl-Tie-EncryptedHash, which
>> is under the Artistic license (only). If this is not an acceptable
>> license, the package will have to go, and so will perl-Crypt-RSA (which
>> depends on it) and anything else that depends on that.
> Would you ask upstream if they'd be willing to relicense either under
> the same terms as perl or Artistic 2.0?
More information about the Fedora-packaging