[Fedora-packaging] Licensing guidelines suggestions
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Mon Aug 13 13:54:58 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:30 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I've been working my way through my packages, updating the license
> fields as appropriate. I just came across perl-Tie-EncryptedHash, which
> is under the Artistic license (only). If this is not an acceptable
> license, the package will have to go, and so will perl-Crypt-RSA (which
> depends on it) and anything else that depends on that.
Would you ask upstream if they'd be willing to relicense either under
the same terms as perl or Artistic 2.0?
More information about the Fedora-packaging