[Fedora-packaging] review guidelines vs packaging guidelines

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le Jeu 23 août 2007 15:34, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le Jeu 23 août 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
>>
>> > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the
>> guidelines
>> > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is
>> impossible.
>>
>> I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time
>> do
>> they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or
>> multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be
>
> Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all
> the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of
> all
> the examples:
>
> "In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing
> after
> a package uninstall."

Who can add this ?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot