[Fedora-packaging] tex related packages names

Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 16:29:45 UTC 2007

On 30/08/2007, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> I think that there are 2 distinct issues that are raised in your
> proposal
> * tex related package names
> * virtual requires/provides
> I think that they should be discussed apart. The second issue could be
> solved simply without the packaging commitee ruling, but by asking
> Jindrich to add the virtual provide. Then the use of this provide could
> be advocated in the guidelines.


> I suggest discussing the virtual provides in one of the texlive
> submissions.


> For the tex related package names, my personnal point of view would be
> not to distinguish tex and latex add-ons (at least in the name). I have
> a slight preference for prepending tex- to all the tex/latex related
> packages.

Yes - I favour that too, but put other suggestions up there for consideration.

> --
> Pat
> --
> Fedora-packaging mailing list
> Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list