[Fedora-packaging] Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts

Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Thu Aug 30 19:08:20 UTC 2007

On Thursday 30 August 2007, Harald Hoyer wrote:

> > I also don't really like hardcoding "fdr" where "rh" was before...
> hardcoding?

The point I believe is that if we want a separate function in the init script 
template to be invoked for the status action, plain "status" cannot be used 
because there already is a function by that name in /etc/init.d/functions so 
it needs to have some other name.  A "fdr_" prefix is IMHO as good as 
anything but some people don't like it.

One way to solve it would be just to invoke the "status" 
from /etc/init.d/functions in the "status" action case and ditch the current 
separate fdr_status function.

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list