[Fedora-packaging] Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers

Matthias Clasen mclasen at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 15:48:32 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 09:39 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> writes:
> AT> If it's a small number I'd go with Ville and have them properly
> AT> split out their *-devel. It's much cleaner that way.
> That way leads in many of not most cases to a -devel file containing a
> single .h file, which I see as being far less clean.

That argument did not stop single-file -devel packages for .pc files...

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list