[Fedora-packaging] Re: Executable documentation

[Paul Howarth]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> writes:
>>>>
>>>> RD> imo, executable %doc's are ok, just not in %_datadir/%_docdir.
>>>>
>>>> Then where should they be?  %_bindir? 
>>>
>>> or under %_libdir somewhere.
>>
>> What's wrong with having them under %_docdir? 
> 
> I was speaking in the context of binary executables, and putting them 
> under %_datadir doesn't mesh with the intent of arch-independent data 
> and the FHS.

So noarch stuff like perl scripts would be OK?

Paul.