[Fedora-packaging] Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Tue Feb 6 20:34:38 UTC 2007
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 14:13, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > Rather than blanket approval for the status quo, I think it would be
> > better to first discuss whether -devel packages for some perl modules
> > should be introduced instead.
> Does anyone know about how many perl packages we're talking about? If
> it's a small number I'd go with Ville and have them properly split out
> their *-devel.
Just for the record, I don't have a real opinion yet, so you won't know where
you'll end up if you decide to go with me at this point :). All I suggested
above was discussion about it (which we now have, good).
More information about the Fedora-packaging