[Fedora-packaging] Firmware packaging

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski dominik at greysector.net
Tue Feb 13 18:53:24 UTC 2007

On Tuesday, 13 February 2007 at 18:01, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Saou (thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net) said: 
> > For the ipw2100 and ipw2200 firmwares, do updated written
> > permissions still need to be obtained from Intel, or do the current
> > ones match these new guidelines? (I'm asking because I always thought
> > they both were fine, but they weren't)
> The ipw2100/2200 licenses, as written, were deemed OK. (Yes, this
> is a change.)

If that is correct, why are #217350 and #217351 still blocking FE-Legal?


Fedora Extras contributor  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list