[Fedora-packaging] Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
steve at silug.org
Wed Feb 14 21:22:40 UTC 2007
There's nothing like coming into a discussion *really* late...
(Sorry, $dayjob has been hell recently.)
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:18:18PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "TC" == Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> writes:
> TC> My concern is that if we make a perl-devel here, some things that
> TC> had perl as an unstated BuildRequires will suddenly stop building
> TC> until they add perl-devel.
> If so, this needs to happen rather soon. Can we get buy-in from Robin
> and perhaps a couple of mass-packagers like Steve Pritchard?
My only concern is that some of our BuildRequires will need to be on
perl-foo-devel instead of perl(foo), and I may or may not be able to
figure that out automatically in cpanspec.
If I were going to look for things to be concerned with in the perl
package, I'd probably worry about noarch packages being in
/usr/lib/perl5 instead of /usr/share/perl5. :-)
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
More information about the Fedora-packaging