[Fedora-packaging] Re: Source Url Guidelines

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Feb 14 22:40:06 UTC 2007

On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:57 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:45:25PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > 
> > Here's my first draft of a SourceURL guideline.  This tries to
> > encapsulate current practices but a few new things had to be added
> > related to SRPMs where no upstream source exists.  This draft will
> > probably need some touching up as I whipped it up pretty quickly but
> > hopefully it captures the spirit of what we're trying to achieve.
> Looks OK. But since we're commenting on source origin could somewhere
> a kind request ("SHOULD") to (srpm-)package upstream sources/patches
> with original timestamps where possible be embedded?

That sounds like a good best practice.  It sounds like a separate item
the way things are currently phrased.  Do you have some wording to fit
it in, or do you just want to throw it in a separate recommendation.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070214/001badd3/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list