[Fedora-packaging] Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 16:57:48 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 09:20 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> writes:
> AT> Request for voting on dropping the *mandatory* from the guidelines
> AT> and explicitely cast it into a *suggestion*
> -1

This puts us back where we started.  It was a suggestion until recently.
The fact that it wasn't mandatory just confused reviewers and made
people debate the issue over and over inside of bugzilla.

Let's move forward:
1) Make a clear rule on a buildroot value that fixes the technical
2) Get changes made to rpm so that F7/8 and RHEL6 don't have to worry
about this.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070220/6d634ddb/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list