[Fedora-packaging] Re: Executable documentation

[Rex Dieter]

Paul Howarth wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> writes:
>>>
>>> RD> imo, executable %doc's are ok, just not in %_datadir/%_docdir.
>>>
>>> Then where should they be?  %_bindir? 
>>
>> or under %_libdir somewhere.
> 
> What's wrong with having them under %_docdir? 

I was speaking in the context of binary executables, and putting them 
under %_datadir doesn't mesh with the intent of arch-independent data 
and the FHS.

-- Rex