[Fedora-packaging] Re: Executable documentation

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Mon Feb 26 15:35:36 UTC 2007

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> writes:
>>>> RD> imo, executable %doc's are ok, just not in %_datadir/%_docdir.
>>>> Then where should they be?  %_bindir? 
>>> or under %_libdir somewhere.
>> What's wrong with having them under %_docdir? 
> I was speaking in the context of binary executables, and putting them 
> under %_datadir doesn't mesh with the intent of arch-independent data 
> and the FHS.

So noarch stuff like perl scripts would be OK?


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list