[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
Tom 'spot' Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Jan 17 04:59:52 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 05:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the
> > Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some
> > additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording
> > here and there.
> > FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in
> > place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote
> > +1. ;)
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts
> This example is doesn't make sense:
> * Move the man pages into different sections in each package (e.g.
> man1/myapi.1.gz and man3/myapi.3.gz)
> man1 and man3 serve different purposes, therefore moving man-pages
> from man1 to man3 is not applicable nor advisable.
> +1 with the sentence above removed.
Good point. Sentence removed.
More information about the Fedora-packaging