[Fedora-packaging] Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:52:52AM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net (Axel Thimm) writes:
> 
> > So let me ask again: What's really that bad about including the
> > current *.la files into devel by default (unless really needed in
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > main packages)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Again: it depends on the (more or less) legitimated module whether .la
> files (of listed dependency_libs) are required at runtime. Therefore,
> .la files MUST be in main (when they are packaged at all).
> 
> 
> 
> Enrico
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070118/14304700/attachment.sig>