[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 20:40:21 UTC 2007
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 14:45, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the
> Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some
> additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording
> here and there.
> FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in
> place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote
> +1. ;)
It was brought up that since RHEL is based on Fedora releases, and RHEL does
crazy things like support RHEL3 to RHEL5 upgrades, it is reasonable to have
conflicts information in a Fedora package that dates a little farther back
than the latest supported Fedora release, since we're trying to use these
packages and guidelines for RHEL too.
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fedora-packaging