[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2

Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs at math.uh.edu
Tue Jan 16 20:50:00 UTC 2007

>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> writes:

JLT> I don't think that we should allow any implicit package
JLT> Do we need to note under "Optional Functionality" that the
JLT> Conflicts: should go away when the package being conflicted with
JLT> is in the repository and the oldest possible version in a
JLT> particular distro release is new enough not to conflict?  This
JLT> would get rid of many of the conflicts that glibc has.

Umm, you know, it helps to hit reload so you're actually reading the
correct version.

 - J<

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list