[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 21:05:01 UTC 2007

On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:00, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> No, actually, RHEL doesn't support v3 -> v5 upgrades afaik. At least,
> RHEL has never previously supported upgrades across more than one major
> release.

Hrm, I'm getting conflicting information from those over the wall.

However even still, RHEL4 -> RHEL5 is a pretty big jump, that's FC3~ -> FC6 to 
think about.  I just think we could widen our horizon a bit on how long to 
keep a (valid) conflict in the spec file.

Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070116/b54da123/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list