[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 21:05:01 UTC 2007
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:00, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> No, actually, RHEL doesn't support v3 -> v5 upgrades afaik. At least,
> RHEL has never previously supported upgrades across more than one major
Hrm, I'm getting conflicting information from those over the wall.
However even still, RHEL4 -> RHEL5 is a pretty big jump, that's FC3~ -> FC6 to
think about. I just think we could widen our horizon a bit on how long to
keep a (valid) conflict in the spec file.
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fedora-packaging