[Fedora-packaging] Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Thu Jan 18 01:48:47 UTC 2007

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:45:57AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:04:47 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > No, I don't favour "bloat"ing, you often seem to assume strange
> > things about people you communicate with.
> It's just you, Axel. It's triggered by your strange replies. ;) I
> try to explain the problem to you and in return only get something
> like "Yes, that's what *-devel packages are about" which tells me
> you are not serious.

You're now getting personal, watch the line. And I do know for a fact
that it's not "just me".

> As much as I support upstream changes, it is beyond my motivation to
> be the one to take the lead here.

But it is your motivation obviously to head towards the opposite

> I have not even seen any solutions other than killing .la files
> except where the used ltdl doesn't understand .so files.

Maybe because your toolbox at home only has a hammer?

How many times did I mention in this thread that there are working
patches even used for quite some time in other distros?
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070118/92e65ce4/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list