[Fedora-packaging] DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Wed Jan 31 06:57:05 UTC 2007
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 1/30/07, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
>> As spot requested, here's an update to the wording of:
>> to make it clear that desktop-file-install usage is mandatory to help
>> ensure .desktop file safety and spec-compliance.
> I think mentioning vendor-id is useless, since now fedora packaging
> policies doesn't include "fedora" as vendor name .
Uh, yes it does:
"If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as
That part of the policy remains unchanged.
More information about the Fedora-packaging