[Fedora-packaging] Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jul 3 22:31:59 UTC 2007

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:19:38PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "JO" == Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> writes:
> JO> Sometimes these discussions astound me.  "Hey, broken Makefiles
> JO> exist!  Let's stop using smp_mflags everywhere."  Can common sense
> JO> not apply here?
> Actually it did; the five members of the committee present at the
> meeting today voted unanimously against this proposal.

I thought there was no quorum.

And how does that fit in comon sense? ;)

OK, I got it, another one down.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070704/afb58c8c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list