[Fedora-packaging] Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jul 3 22:31:59 UTC 2007
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:19:38PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "JO" == Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> writes:
>
> JO> Sometimes these discussions astound me. "Hey, broken Makefiles
> JO> exist! Let's stop using smp_mflags everywhere." Can common sense
> JO> not apply here?
>
> Actually it did; the five members of the committee present at the
> meeting today voted unanimously against this proposal.
I thought there was no quorum.
And how does that fit in comon sense? ;)
OK, I got it, another one down.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070704/afb58c8c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list