[Fedora-packaging] License Tag Draft
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 23:47:14 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 19:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> And what is the purpose of commenting licenses in the file list, apart
> from making the packagers life miserable ?
I agree. Or at least, I disagree with the example and scope in the
Draft. I don't think we care what the license of an individual built
program is. We might care what the license of a built library is.
Whether it's better to mark libraries with a spec comment or make it
mandatory to split libraries that are licensed differently from other
code, I don't know, though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Fedora-packaging