[Fedora-packaging] License Tag Draft

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Jul 27 12:54:03 UTC 2007

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:47:52 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:

> IMHO in the case of multi-licensing we should choose one of the
> possible licenses and stick with it. Only revisit the choice if
> another fedora package forces us to, and let the packager of this
> other package do the licensing analysis.

We can't just do that, as we also provide them the srpm/source which is
not yet linked to anything, and thus is not limited to which license
the end user chooses to receive/use the source under.


Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070727/780f59c6/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list