[Fedora-packaging] Re: Multiple version naming overly restrictive

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jul 3 22:08:58 UTC 2007


On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:24:40PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 14:16:43 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > '''
> > For many reasons, it is sometimes advantageous to keep multiple versions
> > of a package in Fedora to be installed simultaneously. When doing so,
> > the package name should reflect this fact. One package should use the
> > base name with no versions and all other addons should note their
> > version in the name.
> > '''
> +1
+1





-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070704/08ce446f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list