OCaml and static linking (was old thread: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Issues with Ocaml and Static Linking)
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 18:41:10 UTC 2007
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I ended up copying the solution that Debian use -- when building detect
>> if ocamlopt (the native code compiler) is available.
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml?action=show#head-14a9d22bff07b51f58d01bb4e79bcbe98e426a7c
>>
>> I built four packages this way, testing on a "simulated" bytecode-only
>> architecture.
>>
> Looks good. What are the caveats to doing things this way for the %
> files section? I imagine as long as wildcards are used it will work but
> we might want to have an example with a comment saying that the wildcard
> makes it work on both native and non-native archs.
With the four packages I did so far, I ended up with %if %opt
conditionals in the %files section. For example:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571
http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar.spec
has:
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc CHANGES README TODO
%{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/META
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.cmxa
%endif
%{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.mli
Is that not right?
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070607/f77d9b38/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list